Public relations network privacy and Federal Trade Commission

Timing is everything when you are your company is listed, or when government agencies are seeking more Congressional Budget funds. Yes, if we have perfect timing, we will all one-percenters, I imagine. I would like to a higher level, if I may want in time for the government and corporate issues?

You see, April 9, 2012 in The New York Times article entitled "fair charges on MySpace to break the laws of the United States in the share users' personal information" by Edward Wyatt. The article points out, continue to fight against the invasion of privacy on the Internet, the Federal Trade Commission charged Tuesday MySpace in violation of federal law in breach of its promise not to share users' personal information, including their web browsing habits, advertising agencies, ".

In addition, the article pointed out that the Federal Trade Commission claims that from January 2009 to June 2010, from October 2010 to October 2011, MySpace and social media sites, sending information, including the user's internal identification number, their age and gender to MySpace advertising outside advertising networks. "

Well, yes, I understand the whole privacy debate, when it comes to online social network, and perhaps that is why I have never in that they participate in their own. However, I find it even curious about the FTC reconciliation time is only a brief moment, Facebook, its IPO (expected date; May 18, 2012, if approved by the SEC instrument). Anyone really know how our regulators in the United States, then, know that monied interests, litigation or violation of a government, or even that a contravention of the regulations behind.

I am pointing at play here, or call "crony capitalism", the question mark behind the scenes Tips? Ah, yes, no - but I do point out obvious. The reality is that I can say more than 10 Federal Trade Commission and the point of major cases enforcement action behind the political and business or industry interests. I just want to say 10 seconds, if not Facebook in the upcoming initial public offering of shares of billions of dollars 100S - then why now? If the FTC really want to show that the neutral, they had to wait until after the IPO, plus a few months, after all, they have been waiting for so long.

Well, now, did not name names or playing petty informer - I said, we need a complete and comprehensive survey of the FTC and their activities - who complained that members of Congress the largest chain of command, their lobbying list. In addition, any complaints from any of privacy - as long as we are investigating the fair, let's run domain and check the FDA, the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the Securities and Exchange Commission, FBI, Federal Communications Commission, the Environmental Protection Agency , as well as all the institutions of the entire alphabet soup of agencies.

We need responsible and accountable government, if we can not get it needs to be regenerated.

Reference only and write this article the example of another "to strengthen public relations, Google may be a fair fight a large version of the article in the Wall Street Journal pointed out that both the government and Google PR pre-test their cases, in the opinion court. This is just to tell you a circus, our regulatory agencies have created for us, but I want to ask, I asked serious; what use is it?